Interim results: Chris Sutton is not buying the Celtic Board’s justifications.
Interim results: Chris Sutton is not buying the Celtic Board’s justifications.
Chris Sutton, a former striker for Celtic, has attacked the team’s justifications for not getting ready for the transfer market.
The team nearly defended why they had more than £60 million in the bank when they revealed their interim results and commentary yesterday.
Remarks made by Peter Lawwell, as stated in an editorial in Sutton’s Daily Record. The club’s inability to plan and execute transfers during the club’s two previous transfer windows was not adequately addressed by them.
Sincerely, I didn’t feel that there were enough well-written answers to the pertinent topics. Primarily, discontent with the team’s lack of further assistance choices.
Interim results: Chris Sutton is not buying the Celtic Board’s justifications.
Although there was a collective admission of guilt, nothing changed, and the key question remains: why were these errors made?
“Who bears the fault? Although they’ll never admit it, there is responsibility somewhere if money were available, and that exposes Celtic to a great deal of criticism and conjecture.
The designated targets were not accessible. Okay, list a few or more alternatives. To put it plainly, are you telling me that Alexandro Bernabei is the only left-back available to cover Greg Taylor better than anyone else? Come on.
Furthermore, I’m not quite sure how Celtic is related to transfer activity in England being at its lowest point in ten years.
Regardless of what happened in England, would they have paid a lot of money to acquire from the Premier League down south.
In light of the comments made by Brendan Rodgers regarding the necessity of greater bravery in the marketplace?
The comment regarding England is true, and since English teams were less active due to FFP. Celtic should have benefited more from this since they would not have been competing for players in the £5–10 million area.
Get more related news on https://sportviewers.com
Leave a Reply