FFP restricts newcastle from signing certain players, terms it a requirement for “fair market value”

FFP restricts newcastle from buying and selling certain players, terms it a requirement for “fair market value”

The FA may forbid clubs from scheduling profitable friendlies at the conclusion of the season in response to the announcement that Newcastle would take on Tottenham in May, according to The Times.

Three days after the season’s last game, the match is set to take place in Australia. This prompted some worries, particularly in light of the next major event this summer, but it was well knowledge that the incentives for both parties were the potential for financial gain and commercial expansion.

Naturally, it wasn’t until Newcastle did it that this became a problem. Nothing was done despite other clubs having already made similar trips to America and Asia for their season-ending matches.

This is starting to resemble Newcastle United’s uniform. First, there were persistent efforts to thwart the Saudi takeover. Next, there was a change in the FFP regulations to restrict our spending, an emphasis on “fair market value” when consenting to business agreements, and a ban on related-party transactions that prevented us from loaning out SPL players to Saudi Arabia or selling specific players to the country, as Chelsea did.

It can’t be a coincidence that during the last two years, there have been so many modifications to the rules intended to restrict our expansion. What comes next? It’s starting to go beyond humor.

They have implemented regulations that limit the amount of money clubs can spend. Then, in an attempt to boost revenue, clubs obstruct several avenues for doing so and have the authority to select which sponsorship agreements to reject. Sounds like a concerted attempt to limit a certain club’s expansion with the goal of upsetting the “big six.”

Get more related news on https://sportviewers.com